Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BackgroundThe sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria is inadequate for detecting low-density, often asymptomatic infections, such as those that can occur when screening pregnant women for malaria. The performance of the Alere™ Ultra-sensitive Malaria Ag Plasmodium falciparum RDT (uRDT) was assessed retrospectively in pregnant women in Indonesia.MethodsThe diagnostic performance of the uRDT and the CareStart™ Malaria HRP2/pLDH VOM (Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae) Combo RDT (csRDT) were assessed using 270 stored red blood cell pellets and plasma samples from asymptomatic pregnant women. These included 112 P. falciparum negative and 158 P. falciparum positive samples detected by a composite test (qPCR, LAMP, nPCR) as reference standard. Diagnostic indicators: sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the level of agreement (kappa) were calculated for comparison.ResultsCompared with the reference test, the uRDT had a sensitivity of 19.6% (95% CI 13.9-26.8) and specificity of 98.2% (93.1-99.7%). The csRDT was 22.8% (16.7-30.3) sensitive and 95.5% (89.4-98.3) specific for P. falciparum infections. Performance of the uRDT was non-significantly different to the csRDT (p = 0.169). RDT outcome was stratified by qPCR cycling threshold (Ct), and performance of the RDTs was found to be comparable across parasite loads.ConclusionThe uRDT performed similarly to the currently used csRDTs in detecting P. falciparum infections in asymptomatic pregnant women. In these settings, molecular diagnostics are currently the most sensitive for malaria.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1186/s12936-020-3110-6

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2020-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

19

Addresses

D, e, p, a, r, t, m, e, n, t, , o, f, , T, r, o, p, i, c, a, l, , D, i, s, e, a, s, e, , B, i, o, l, o, g, y, , a, n, d, , D, e, p, a, r, t, m, e, n, t, , o, f, , C, l, i, n, i, c, a, l, , S, c, i, e, n, c, e, s, ,, , L, i, v, e, r, p, o, o, l, , S, c, h, o, o, l, , o, f, , T, r, o, p, i, c, a, l, , M, e, d, i, c, i, n, e, ,, , L, i, v, e, r, p, o, o, l, ,, , L, 3, , 5, Q, A, ,, , U, K, .

Keywords

Erythrocytes, Humans, Plasmodium, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Malaria, Falciparum, DNA, Protozoan, Odds Ratio, Sensitivity and Specificity, Retrospective Studies, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Indonesia, Female, Coinfection, Diagnostic Screening Programs