A prospective cohort study to describe the morphology of buboes in patients with bubonic plague using ultrasound imaging.
Bourner J., Dwivedi R., Randremanana RV., Razananaivo LH., Pesonel E., Garcia-Gallo E., Joekes E., Mayouya-Gamana T., Fanomezantsoa ER., Minoarisoa ANA., Rajoeliarivelo E., Randriamanantsoa MG., Abdel Salam AP., Rojek A., Rafaralahivoavy TR., Raberahona M., Olliaro P.
BackgroundBubonic plague, caused by Yersinia pestis, is characterised by painful, enlarged lymph nodes ("buboes"). Despite centuries of clinical recognition, bubo morphology has been described only through observation and palpation. This study aimed to characterise the sonographic features of buboes over time in confirmed bubonic plague and evaluate the validity of digital calliper measurements compared to ultrasound.Methods/principle findingsWe conducted a prospective cohort study at three rural health centres in Madagascar between January and March 2024. Participants with suspected bubonic plague underwent ultrasound imaging and digital calliper measurements of enlarged lymph nodes at inclusion (D1), and follow-up on D4 and D11. Bubo size and morphology were assessed by clinicians - who received targeted ultrasound training for the study - using portable ultrasound devices, with expert radiologist oversight. Neither clinicians or radiologists were blind to clinical information or outcomes. Final diagnoses were retrospectively assigned using WHO criteria and national laboratory results. Of 16 enrolled participants, 12 were confirmed plague cases. Most buboes exhibited normal morphology on D1, with limited change over time despite clinical improvement. No association was found between bubo size or morphology and clinical status. Digital calliper measurements differed substantially from ultrasound. Study sonographers achieved good agreement with radiologists on bubo size, but lower agreement on structural features.Conclusions/significanceBubo morphology and size do not appear to correlate with clinical status, challenging their use as indicators of treatment response. Digital callipers introduce significant measurement error. Newly trained clinicians can perform size measurements reliably, but further training is needed for accurate sonographic characterisation.