USING PHYLOGENETICS TO INFER HIV-1 TRANSMISSION DIRECTION BETWEEN KNOWN TRANSMISSION PAIRS

AbstractInferring the transmission direction between linked individuals living with HIV provides unparalleled power to understand the epidemiology that determines transmission. Phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction approaches infer the transmission direction by identifying the individual in whom the most recent common ancestor of the virus populations originated. However, these methods vary in their accuracy but it is unclear why. To evaluate the performance of phylogenetic ancestral state reconstruction, we inferred the transmission direction for 112 HIV transmission pairs where transmission direction was known and detailed additional information was available. We then fit a statistical model to evaluate the extent to which epidemiological, sampling, genetic and phylogenetic factors influenced the outcome of the inference. We repeated the analysis under real-life conditions with only routinely-collected data. We found that the inference of transmission direction depends principally on the topology class and branch length characteristics of the phylogeny. Under real-life conditions, the probability of identifying the correct transmission direction increases from 52%—when a monophyletic-monophyletic or paraphyletic-polyphyletic tree topology is observed, when the sample size in both partners is small and when the tip closest to the root does not agree with the state at the root—to 93% when a paraphyletic-monophyletic topology is observed, when the sample size is large and when the tip closest to the root agrees with root state. Our results suggest that discordance between previous studies in inferring the transmission direction can be explained by differences in key phylogenetic properties that arise due to different evolutionary, epidemiological and sampling processes.Significance StatementIdentifying the direction of infectious disease transmission between individuals provides unparalleled power to understand infectious disease epidemiology. With epidemiological and clinical information typically unable to distinguish the direction, phylogenetic analysis of pathogen sequence data is an alternative approach. However, when these phylogenetic methods have been implemented, their accuracy is highly variable, and the reasons for this discordance is unknown. Here we analyse sequence data from over 100 pairs of individuals for whom both the direction of transmission of HIV is known and detailed epidemiological and sampling information is available. We find that easily quantifiable phylogenetic characteristics discriminate whether a phylogenetically-inferred transmission direction is correct. Our analysis highlights that phylogenetic approaches are unsuitable for individual-level analysis such as forensic investigations.